A Bloomberg investigation last year found that dozens of large companies - including Delta - relied on "junk" credits to make carbon-neutrality claims.Įven when a carbon-offset project is valid, there's no guarantee that its carbon savings are permanent. Most of Delta's offsets paid for projects that would have happened anyway, without the airline's investment, the suit contends - meaning they shouldn't count as truly counterbalancing the airline's carbon emissions. However, an investigation by The Guardian earlier this year concluded that more than 90% of Verra's rainforest offsets had no climate benefit. But a growing body of research has shown that emissions-reduction benefits of offsets are dubious at best.įor instance, Delta's forestry and agriculture offsets for 2021 were certified by the carbon-offset vendor Verra, according to the complaint. Offsets not good enoughĬarbon offsets, which rely on paying for a climate-beneficial activity like reforestation to counteract the carbon pollution a company creates, have emerged as a major part of many corporate climate pledges. The suit alleges that "thousands" of travelers potentially paid more for Delta's flights because of the company's climate stance. "They can't just claim neutrality if that's not factually accurate," she told the AP. Berrin told the outlet that climate change gives her and her generation great anxiety, and that she was frustrated to learn that Delta's climate claims which made her comfortable paying more for a flight may be lies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |